Impact of Mobility Models on the Performance of Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks

Roshanasan, Mohammad Amin and QasMarrogy, Ghassan A. and Murtadha, Zainab and Uddin, Jia and Oyekanlu, Emmanuel A. (2013) Impact of Mobility Models on the Performance of Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks. Open International Journal of Informatics (OIJI), 2 (1). pp. 46-58. ISSN 2289-2370

[thumbnail of Research Article] Text (Research Article)
Article_OIJI_23-06-2013.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (1MB)

Abstract

Mobile ad hoc network consists of wireless mobile nodes, where nodes convey message to each other without any pre-established infrastructure or centralized control. The wireless ad hoc network eradicates the complications which may arise while setting up the infrastructure. The mobility model is crucial when evaluating routing protocols exhibition in mobile ad hoc networks. Two parameters are very important when dealing with mobility behavior of mobile nodes: pause time and maximum speed. In this paper, we investigate the effect of mobility model on state of art proactive and reactive routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks. The Reference Point Group Mobility model and the Random Way Point Mobility model represent the group and an entity mobility model used in this simulation to compare and analyze the performance of the routing protocols. In this study the performance analysis and comparison of the routing protocols under different mobility scenarios are evaluated in Network Simulator 2. Four important performance metrics of ad hoc networks including average end-to-end delay, packet delivery ratio, normalized routing load or overhead and average number of hops are considered. Based on the empirical study, both propagation models cause different impact on the AODV and DSDV routing protocol. Where, AODV performs better with the RPGM than the RWPM with respect to end-to end-delay, normalized routing load and average number of hops. However, in delivery ratio AODV performs better with the RWPM than the RPGM. On the other hand, AODV and DSDV protocols have similar results in delivery ratio and average number of hops and DSDV performed better than AODV in normalized routing and end-to-end delay. Finally, it can be concluded that no protocol significantly outperforms the other in all scenarios and matrics considered.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Destination-Sequenced Distance Vector (DSDV); MANET; Reference Point Group Mobility model (RPGM); Ad Hoc on Demand Distance Vector (AODV); Mobility model; Random Way Point Mobility model (RWPM); Network Simulator (NS-2); Routing protocols.
Subjects: Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA76 Computer software
T Technology > T Technology (General)
Divisions: Department of Informatic and Software Engineering > Research papers
Depositing User: ePrints Depositor
Date Deposited: 25 Aug 2025 06:06
Last Modified: 25 Aug 2025 06:06
URI: https://eprints.cihanuniversity.edu.iq/id/eprint/4581

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item