Multi-objective Optimization of Daylight Illuminance Indicators and Energy Usage Intensity for Office Space in Tehran by Genetic Algorithm

Hakimazari, Mohammad and Baghoolizadeh, Mohammadreza and Sajadi, S. Mohammad and Kheiri, Parisa and Moghaddam, Maryam Yaghoubi and Rostamzadeh-Renani, Mohammad and Rostamzadeh-Renani, Reza and Hamooleh, Mahmoud Behzadi (2024) Multi-objective Optimization of Daylight Illuminance Indicators and Energy Usage Intensity for Office Space in Tehran by Genetic Algorithm. Energy Reports, 11. pp. 3283-3306. ISSN 23524847

[thumbnail of Research Articles] Text (Research Articles)
Article_ER_11-03-2024.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (14MB)

Abstract

One of the important categories in office spaces is the control of daylight and energy consumption. By controlling
natural light, it is possible to provide uniform light in the entire space, sufficient daylight, and visual comfort for
office workers. In many cases, this important issue can be resolved by choosing the right shading. In this study,
the aim is to investigate the significance of some important parameters such as DoS (Depth of Shading), FO
(Facade Offset), FSoS (Flip Start of Shading), LoS (Location of Shading), WWR (Window to Wall Ratio), CoS
(Count of Shading), AoS (Angle of Shading), and HoW (Height of Window) in the optimal design of shading for
an office environment in Tehran. For this purpose, eight variables have been designed and the aim is to improve
the indicators of Energy Usage Intensity (EUI), Spatial Daylight Autonomy(sDA), Daylight Glare Probability
(DGP), and Tc (Thermal comfort) in the office space. For optimization in the grasshopper environment, Wallacei’s algorithm was used. Then, the algorithm provides a set of optimal points. Then a point was selected as
optimal by the WSM (Weighted Sum Method) method. According to the input variables that are DoS, FO, FSoS,
LoS, WWR, CoS, AoS, and HoW its optimal point values are 0.4, 0, Up, Horizontal, 80, 5, 30, 0.5, respectively.
The results show that the values of sDA, DGP, EUI, and Tc were improved by 43.6%, 52.77%, 13.9, and 3.696%,
respectively, before and after shading optimization. Also, the annual glare and the hottest and coldest day of the
year were checked where there were around 500(cd/m2
) and 200(cd/m2
) reduction of glare value in winter and
summer seasons, respectively. Finally, the value of Useful Daylight Illuminance (UDI)before and after the
installation of the optimal shading was 25.8 and 68.4, respectively

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Wallacei , Daylight Optimization , Shading Device
Subjects: Q Science > Q Science (General)
T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
Divisions: Department of Nutrition > Research papers
Depositing User: ePrints Depositor
Date Deposited: 21 Nov 2024 11:50
Last Modified: 21 Nov 2024 11:50
URI: https://eprints.cihanuniversity.edu.iq/id/eprint/2851

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item